NLC, TUC CALL: ‘NLC, TUC CALL FOR DEATH PENALTY ON CORRUPT GOVT OFFICIALS RIDICULOUS ‘
By Edward Jaleyemi
ASABA-
FORMER Commissioner of Police, Chief Ikechukwu Aduba (retd), has described as
bizarre and unrefined the call by the Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC and Trade
Union Congress, TUC, for death penalty on treasury looters to check official
corruption.
Aduba, who noted that some Nigerians often disparage
well-meaning citizens for making forthright appraisal, said capital punishment
has not tamed corruption in countries as China and India referred to by the unions,
maintaining that what were required were practical and precautionary measures.
He asserted, “It is truism that Nigerians’ expertise in
corruption is unparalleled the world over and corruption has destroyed every
fabric of the Nigerian society… However, in my view, the call for death penalty
by NLC and TUC is empirically absurd.”
“Emotions aside, they ought to call for immediate reform of the
court system for a speedy conviction of the corrupt, strengthening of the
apparatus of detection and investigation for quick arraignment of the corrupt
and restructuring of the prison system to aid timely justice delivery in
corruption cases.
“These would serve as more effective deterrence than imposition
of death penalty. Without touching these critical areas, death penalty for
corruption would not have a salutary effect, it would hardly check corruption
just as it has been ineffective in checking armed robbery and lately
kidnapping,” the ex-commissioner said.
Aduba stated, “Globally, advance economies had been able to
combat official corruption through other proactive and preventable measures.
None had used the medium of death penalty, which in itself is reactive to and
already consummated action.”
He said that China, currently acclaimed universally as having
the stiffest punishment for official corruption “cannot match decent countries
such as Sweden, Switzerland and Namibia in the corruption index,” adding,
“These other countries used other proactive tools and preventive measures to
achieve milestones and not death penalty.”
His words, “In conclusion, I wish to state equivocally that
deterrence, retribution (restitution) and reformation are the three essence of
punishment. Death penalty as a form of punishment was initially thought to
achieve deterrence, NLC should note that these were in primordial crude
society, yet that goal was never achieved as savagery still characterized those
societies.”
Comments